How to Prove Abuse of Discretion

3 pages

Please download to get full document.

View again

of 3
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
How to prove judicial abuse of discretion in court proceedings.
  1 Reprinted with Permission by The Daily Recorder  How to Maximize Your Chances of Showing anAbuse of Discretion on Appeal An important consideration in any appeal is the applicable standard of review.The standard of review is the lens through which the c ourt will view the lower court‟s rulings, and in many cases, it can control the outcome. As one law professor put it: “There are wide variations in the degree of „wrongness‟ which will be tolerated” in theappellate courts. Maurice Rosenberg,  Appellate Review of Trial Court Discretion , 79F.R.D. 173, 176 (1978).In California state appellate courts, there are three main standards of review: denovo or independent review , which does not grant any deference to the trial court‟s decision; substantial evidence, which applies to findings of fact; and the deferential abuseof discretion standard. This article provides tips for those who are appealing judgmentssubject to the abuse of discretion standard, which is considered to be the most deferentialstandard of review. Defining Abuse of Discretion Perhaps no other standard has been discussed as much as the abuse of discretionstandard. The concept can be found in American jurisprudence as far back as the late18th century. See Eldridge v. Lippincott  , 1 N.J.L. 397 (N.J. 1795) (“The law gives the court a complete and unlimited discretion, subject to control only when it appears to have abused its powers to arbitrary or fraudulent purposes”). Courts have offered varyingdefinitions of the standard, making it still very difficult to define. The California Supreme Court has sometimes described the standard as “whether the trial court exceeded the bounds of reason.” See Shamblin v. Brittain , 44 Cal.3d 474,478 (1988). Other courts have offered similar definitions  —  as one court put it, an abuse of discretion occurs only when “it can fairly be said that no judge would reasonably makethe same order under the same circumstances.”  In re Marriage of Lopez  , 38 Cal.App.3d93, 114 (1974).The varying definitions have led to heavy criticism, however. One appellate court complained that the abuse of discretion standard is “so amorphous as to mean everythingand nothing at the same time and be virtually useless as an analytic tool.”  Hurtado v.Statewide Home Loan Company , 167 Cal.App.3d 1019, 1022 (1985). Another courtnoted that such “pejorative boilerplate is misleading since it implies that in every case inwhich a trial court is reversed for abuse of discretion its action was utterly irrational.” City of Sacramento v. Drew , 207 Cal.App.3d 1287, 1297 (1989).More recent cases have followed  Drew and similar decisions, which have noted that the trial court‟s discretion is “subject to the limitations of legal principles governingthe subject of its action, and to reversal on appeal where no reasonable basis for the  2 action is shown.”  Id. So, the amount of discretion the trial court has depends on thestatute or common law governing the issue. If reasonable minds may differ on theoutcome, and the trial court acts within the range of options available, then the appellate court may not substitute its judgment for the trial court, and the trial court‟s decision will  be upheld. Decisions Subject to Abuse of Discretion Standard There are many different matters that are subject to the abuse of discretionstandard. Often the standard is applied to decisions regarding procedural matters, but itcan apply to substantive issues as well. Some of the more common matters subject toabuse of discretion include: discovery rulings; evidentiary rulings; whether to grant leaveto amend a pleading; the amount of an award for attorney‟s fees; rulings on motions todisqualify counsel; injunctions; sanctions; and child custody or visitation determinations.This is by no means an exhaustive list. Best Ways to Show an Abuse of Discretion If you are appealing a judgment subject to the abuse of discretion standard, thereare strategies you can employ. First, consider each particular issue in your appeal andwhether some issues might be subject to a less deferential standard. For example, if you are appealing an award of attorney‟s fees, the question of whether a party is entitled tofees under a particular statute or contract is a question of law, reviewed independently.The decision regarding the amount of the award is reviewed for abuse of discretion. If the issue can properly be characterized as a legal one, you will increase your chance of success on appeal.Second , consider whether the trial court‟s decision is within the ra nge of optionscontemplated by the particular law at issue. Using the attorney‟s fee example above, afee award may be reversed as excessive where the court applied the relevant factors morethan once in determining the amount of the fee. See Ramos v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. , 82 Cal.App.4th 615, 625-626 (2000) (the trial court considered the same factorstwice, using the same factor to calculate the hourly rate and then to enhance it; that wasimpermissible and beyond the range of options available).Third, consider whether you might argue that the trial court failed to properly exercise its discretion. “The failure to exercise discretion is an abuse of discretion.”  Dickson, Carlson & Campillo v. Pole , 83 Cal.App.4th 436, 449 (2000). The court canfail to exercise discretion if it fails to consider relevant factors required to be consideredunder the applicable law. In the case cited above, the trial court abused its discretion because it applied an equitable doctrine without weighing the relevant equities of the parties. A court may also fail to properly exercise discretion if it is mistaken about thelaw. For example, in  Richards, Watson & Gershon v. King  , 39 Cal.App.4th 1176, 1180(1995), the court abused its discretion in dismissing an action by an attorney to collectfees because it erroneously interpreted a statute as barring the action. The trial court did  3not believe it had any discretion in the matter; therefore, it failed to consider the relevantfactors and failed to exercise discretion.Finally, in any appeal involving an abuse of discretion standard, the key towinning is to show a harsh, unjust result. The appellate courts usually will not reversediscretionary decisions based on mere technicalities. You have a much better chance if  you can show that the lower court‟s decision results in clear injustice , such as depriving a party of his or her day in court, or denying all relief to a party.In sum, while winning an appeal subject to an abuse of discretion standard of review is difficult, it is not an impossible task. Appellate courts in California have beenwilling to reverse discretionary decisions more often than you might think. The keys tosuccess are defining and applying the standard clearly and persuasively for the court inlight of the relevant legal principles and the facts of your case; and showing that amanifest injustice will result if the decision is not reversed.C. Athena Roussos is an attorney in Elk Grove, California, and is certified as anAppellate Law Specialist by the California State Bar Board of Legal Specialization. Shealso teaches at McGeorge School of Law in Sacramento. Roussos can be reached at(916) 670-7901 or  Peg Carew Toledo also contributed to this article. Toledo is Of Counsel at Mennemeier,Glassman & Stroud LLP, a Sacramento civil litigation boutique. She is also certified asan Appellate Law Specialist by the California State Bar Board of Legal Specialization.Toledo can be reached at (916) 551-2592 or 
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks