Angkor Wat.doc

9 pages

Please download to get full document.

View again

of 9
All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
Angkor Wat temple assignment
  Angkor Wat Angkor Wat  (Khmer : អង្រវត ) is the largest [1]  Hindu temple complex in the world, situated at Angkor , Camodia, uilt ! King ur!a#arman $$ in the earl! 1%th centur! as his state temple and capital cit!& As the est'preser#ed temple at the site, it is the onl! one to ha#e remained a signiicant religious centre since its oundation  irst Hindu, dedicated to the god *ishnu, then +uddhist& he temple is at the top o the high classical st!le o  Khmer  architecture& $t has  ecome a s!mol o Camodia, appearing on its national lag, and it is the countr!-s prime attraction or #isitors&Angkor .at comines two asic plans o Khmer temple architecture: the temple mountain and the later galleried temple, ased on earl! outh $ndian Hindu architecture, with ke! eatures such as the /agati& $t is designed to represent 0ount 0eru, home o the de#as in Hindu m!tholog!: within a moat and an outer wall &2 kilometres (%&% mi) long are three rectangular galleries, each raised ao#e the next& At the centre o the temple stands a 3uincunx o towers& 4nlike most Angkorian temples, Angkor .at is oriented to the west5 scholars are di#ided as to the signiicance o this& he temple is admired or the grandeur and harmon! o the architecture, its extensi#e  as'relies, and or the numerous de#atas adorning its walls& he modern name, Angkor .at, means 6Cit! emple65  Angkor   is a #ernacular orm o the word nokor   ( នគរ ), which comes rom the anskrit word nagar   (  नगर  )& Wat   is the Khmer  orm o the 7ali word 6#atthu6, meaning 6temple grounds6& 7rior to this time the temple was known as  Preah  Pisnulok   (*ara *ishnuloka in anskrit), ater the posthumous title o its ounder& [%] ã History King ur!a#arman $$, the uilder o Angkor .atAngkor .at lies 8&8 kilometres (&9 mi) north o the modern town o iem eap, and a short distance south and slightl! east o the pre#ious capital, which was centred at +aphuon& $t is in an area o Camodia where there is an important group o ancient structures& $t is the southernmost o Angkor-s main sites&he initial design and construction o the temple took place in the irst hal o the 1%th centur!, during the reign o ur!a#arman $$ (ruled 111  c& 118;)& <edicated to *ishnu, it was uilt as the king-s state temple and capital cit!& As neither the oundation stela nor an! contemporar! inscriptions reerring to the temple ha#e een ound, its srcinal name is unknown, ut it ma! ha#e een known as Vrah Vishnu-lok   ( literall! 6Hol! Vishnu'-Location' , Old Khmer' Cl. Sanskrit  )& ater the presiding deit!& .ork seems to ha#e ended shortl! ater the king-s death, lea#ing some o the  as'relie  decoration uninished& []  $n 11==, approximatel! %= !ears ater the death o ur!a#arman $$, Angkor was sacked ! the Chams, the traditional enemies o the  Khmer& hereater the empire was restored ! a new king, /a!a#arman *$$, who estalished a new capital and state temple (Angkor hom and the +a!on respecti#el!) a ew kilometres to the north&$n the late 1th centur!, Angkor .at graduall! mo#ed rom Hindu to hera#ada +uddhist use, which continues to the present da!& Angkor .at is unusual among the Angkor temples in that although it was somewhat neglected ater the 12th centur! it was ne#er completel! aandoned, its preser#ation eing due in part to the act that its moat also pro#ided some protection rom encroachment ! the >ungle& [9] ?ne o the irst .estern #isitors to the temple was Ant@nio da 0adalena, a 7ortuguese monk who #isited in 182 and said that it 6is o such extraordinar! construction that it is not possile to descrie it with a pen, particularl! since it is like no other uilding in the world& $t has towers and decoration and all the reinements which the human genius can concei#e o&6 [8]  Howe#er, the temple was popularised in the .est onl! in the mid'1Bth centur! on the pulication o Henri 0ouhot-s tra#el notes& he rench explorer wrote o it:6?ne o these templesDa ri#al to that o   olomon, and erected ! some ancient 0ichelangelo D  might take an honourale place eside our most eautiul uildings& $t is grander than an!thing let to us ! Ereece or ome, and presents a sad contrast to the state o ararism in which the nation is now plunged&6 [2] 0ouhot, like other earl! .estern #isitors, ound it diicult to elie#e that the Khmers could ha#e uilt the temple, and mistakenl! dated it to around the same era as ome& he true histor! o Angkor .at was pieced together onl! rom st!listic and epigraphic e#idence accumulated during the suse3uent clearing and restoration work carried out across the whole Angkor site&here were no ordinar! dwellings or houses or other signs o settlement including cooking utensils, weapons, or items o clothing usuall! ound at ancient sites& $nstead there is the e#idence o the monuments themsel#es& [=] rench postcard aout Angkor .at in 1B11Angkor .at re3uired considerale restoration in the %;th centur!, mainl! the remo#al o accumulated earth and #egetation& []  .ork was interrupted ! the ci#il war and Khmer ouge control o the countr! during the 1B=;s and 1B;s, ut relati#el! little damage was done during this period other than the thet and destruction o mostl! post'Angkorian statues& [B] he temple is a powerul s!mol o Camodia, and is a source o great national pride that has actored into Camodia-s diplomatic relations with its neighour hailand, rance and the 4nited tates& A depiction o Angkor .at has een a part o Camodian national lags since the introduction o the irst #ersion circa 12& [1;]  rom a larger historical and e#en transcultural   perspecti#e, howe#er, the temple o Angkor .at did not ecame a s!mol o national pride sui generis ut had een inscried into a larger politico'cultural process o rench'colonial heritage  production in which the srcinal temple site was presented in rench colonial and uni#ersal exhiitions in 7aris and 0arseille etween 1B and 1B=& [11] he splendid artistic legac! o Angkor .at and other Khmer monuments in the Angkor  region led directl! to rance adopting Camodia as a  protectorate on 11 August 12 and in#ading iam to take control o the ruins& his 3uickl! led to Camodia reclaiming lands in the northwestern corner o the countr! that had een under iamese (hai) control since 181 A< (0anich /umsai %;;1), or ! some accounts, 191 A<& [1%]  Camodia gained independence rom rance on B Fo#emer 1B8 and has controlled Angkor .at since that time&<uring the midst o the *ietnam .ar , Chie o tate  Forodom ihanouk  hosted /ac3ueline Kenned! in Camodia to ulill her 6lielong dream o seeing Angkor .at&6 [1] $n /anuar! %;; riots erupted in 7hnom 7enh when a alse rumour circulated that a hai soap opera actress had claimed that Angkor .at elonged to hailand& [19] Architecture Angkor .at, located at 1G%9 ′ 98 ″  F 1;G8% ′ ; ″   , is a uni3ue comination o the temple mountain, the standard design or the empire-s state temples, the later plan o concentric galleries, and inluences rom ?rissa and the Chola o amil Fadu, $ndia& he temple is a representation o 0ount 0eru, the home o the gods: the central 3uincunx o towers s!molises the i#e peaks o the mountain, and the walls and moat the surrounding mountain ranges and ocean& [18]  Access to the upper areas o the temple was progressi#el! more exclusi#e, with the lait! eing admitted onl! to the lowest le#el& [12] 4nlike most Khmer temples, Angkor .at is oriented to the west rather than the east& his has led man! (including ElaiIe and Eeorge CoedJs) to conclude that ur!a#arman intended it to ser#e as his unerar! temple& [1=]  urther e#idence or this #iew is pro#ided ! the  as'relies, which  proceed in a counter'clockwise directionD   rasa!a  in Hindu terminolog!Das this is the re#erse o the normal order& ituals take place in re#erse order during +rahminic uneral ser#ices& []  he archaeologist Charles Higham also descries a container which ma! ha#e een a unerar! >ar which was reco#ered rom the central tower& [1]  $t has een nominated ! some as the greatest expenditure o energ! on the disposal o a corpse& [1B]  reeman and /ac3ues, howe#er, note that se#eral other temples o Angkor depart rom the t!pical eastern orientation, and suggest that Angkor .at-s alignment was due to its dedication to *ishnu, who was associated with the west& [18] A urther interpretation o Angkor .at has een proposed ! leanor 0annikka& <rawing on the temple-s alignment and dimensions, and on the content and arrangement o the as'relies, she  argues that the structure represents a claimed new era o peace under King ur!a#arman $$: 6as the measurements o solar and lunar time c!cles were uilt into the sacred space o Angkor .at, this di#ine mandate to rule was anchored to consecrated chamers and corridors meant to  perpetuate the king-s power and to honor and placate the deities maniest in the hea#ens ao#e&6 [%;][%1]  0annikka-s suggestions ha#e een recei#ed with a mixture o interest and scepticism in academic circles& [1]   he distances hersel rom the speculations o others, such as Eraham Hancock , that Angkor .at is part o a representation o the constellation <raco& [%%] Style 4pper galler! at Angkor .atAngkor .at is the prime example o the classical st!le o Khmer architecture Dthe Angkor .at st!le Dto which it has gi#en its name& +! the 1%th centur! Khmer architects had ecome skilled and conident in the use o sandstone (rather than rick or laterite) as the main uilding material& 0ost o the #isile areas are o sandstone locks, while laterite was used or the outer wall and or hidden structural parts& he inding agent used to >oin the locks is !et to e identiied, although natural resins or slaked lime ha#e een suggested& [%] Angkor .at has drawn praise ao#e all or the harmon! o its design, which has een compared to the architecture o  ancient Ereece and ome& According to 0aurice ElaiIe, a mid'%;th' centur! conser#ator o Angkor, the temple 6attains a classic perection ! the restrained monumentalit! o its inel! alanced elements and the precise arrangement o its proportions& $t is a work o power, unit! and st!le&6 [%9] Architecturall!, the elements characteristic o the st!le include: the ogi#al, redented towers shaped like lotus uds5 hal'galleries to roaden passagewa!s5 axial galleries connecting enclosures5 and the cruciorm terraces which appear along the main axis o the temple& !pical decorati#e elements are de#atas (or apsaras),  as'relies, and on  pediments extensi#e garlands and narrati#e scenes& he statuar! o Angkor .at is considered conser#ati#e, eing more static and less graceul than earlier work & [%8]  ?ther elements o the design ha#e een destro!ed ! looting and the passage o time, including gilded stucco on the towers, gilding on some igures on the as'relies, and wooden ceiling panels and doors& [%2] he Angkor .at st!le was ollowed ! that o the +a!on  period, in which 3ualit! was oten sacriiced to 3uantit!& [%=]  ?ther temples in the st!le are +antea! amr, hommanon, Chao a!
Related Search
We Need Your Support
Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

No, Thanks